|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
EMSEAL has set the standard for precompressed foam sealants. Other than EMSEAL, there is only one US-based manufacturer of precompressed foam sealants. This other manufacturer while offering its own branded products also private-labels their isobutylene-and-wax-base saturated products to all (nine (9) at last count) other US-based expansion joint manufacturers who claim these products as their own. This bulletin describes why the performance of EMSEAL's 100% acrylic impregnated precompressed foam sealant is different and unique. It also offers simple testing procedures that validate these claims and reveal the shortcomings of both wax and asphalt-based technology predecessors. The primary drivers of
the performance of EMSEAL's precompressed sealants are: EMSEAL's own asphalt-compound impregnations as well as the wax-saturations of other alternatives are not capable of the same performance as acrylic-based products. Should you encounter products being offered with the same performance claims, we would encourage that these claims be tested and certified to the same performance conditions described in this bulletin. We believe these performance conditions to accurately reflect those expected to be experienced, or reflect the designers expectations of performance, in applications for which the materials are being specified and installed.
SUMMARY:
BACKGROUND The chemical emulsion fills (in the case of saturation) or coats (in the case of impregnation) the cells of the foam. The foam in turn provides the elastic memory that ensures an inherent active backpressure. The amount of emulsion put into the foam affects the degree to which the mechanical back-pressure of the foam is dampened or deliberately restrained. Some dampening is essential to slow the expansion rate of the foam in order that the product can be practically installed into a pre-constructed joint opening. Too much dampening can negatively affect the product's ability to expand as the joint opens when temperature drops.
Impregnation vs. Saturation: Impregnation is the process of using a controlled amount of emulsion distributed over the cell walls of the foam. This measured coating is designed to avoid choking the foam and over-dampening it's spring-like elastic memory. To achieve watertightness in the foam itself requires the use of an amount of impregnated foam that when compressed achieves a density impermeable to water. Saturation, by contrast, fills the foam cells completely and relies on less foam but a greater amount of chemical emulsion to achieve a seal. This approach has worked historically in some markets where climate and design practice limits the movement range to which the product will be subjected.
Hybrid Precompressed Sealants: The hybridization involved incorporating the dampened-spring feature of impregnated, precompressed foam sealants with a factory cured silicone liquid sealant in the form of a tensionless bellows.
Asphalt, Wax, Acrylic--The Evolution: Both wax and asphalt suffer similar shortcomings--low temperature brittleness and high temperature instability. Recognizing the ability of acrylics to extend the low-temperature flexibility of asphalt as well as to simultaneously improve high temperature stability, EMSEAL evolved its asphalt impregnations to incorporate an acrylic component. This in turn lead towards the development of first-generation 100% acrylic impregnations and ultimately to the latest in the evolution of precompressed foam sealant impregnation--microcell-modified, hydrophobic acrylic impregnations.
Movement, Recovery, and Trade-Offs: For
this reason EMSEAL has never claimed that the foam backing is performing a
waterproofing function in the 100% movement-capable SEISMIC COLORSEAL
product for example. Instead, the acrylic-impregnated foam provides: Claims of 100% movement capability AND watertightness in the foam backing AS WELL AS high temperature stability in combination with compression should be treated skeptically. PERFORMANCE CLAIMS 1. Movement Capability: 100% of nominal material size. More explicitly this 100% is comprised of -50% compression AND +50% extension from nominal size. This means, for example, that 2" nominal material has the capability to be compressed to 1-inch and extend to 3-inches during the thermal cycling of a substrate. 2. Application and Substrate Suitability: These materials are offered for use in applications involving porous substrates such as concrete, brick, stone, etc. and non-porous substrates such as the metals used in curtain walls and metal panels. 3. Active Backpressure: Precompressed sealants are claimed to actively recover as the result of the stored-strain energy of compression in the foam backing. Typical descriptions include “back-pressure inherent in the elastic open-cell foam backing.”, and “works under its own constant internal pressure”.
5. Temperature
Stability and Resistance to Bleeding: High temperature stability
of 185°F (85°C) is typical. SIMULATION Given that if specified and installed into a condition that will utilize the full movement claim of the material, it is reasonable to expect that the products can be compressed down 50% from their nominal size and that this condition will occur during achievable high temperatures on a building. Actual substrate temperatures on dark-colored substrates like bronze or black curtainwall mullions, on a Southerly exposure, during the peak mid-day hours, in summer, are regularly recorded at around 180o F (82o C). For purposes of this testing, temperatures of 180o F (82o C), and 185o F (85oC) were used. Given that these products claim the ability to follow joint opening movement through their inherent backpressure, and that if specified and installed into a condition that will utilize the full movement claim of the material, it is reasonable to expect the material to recover unassisted from the compressed state achieved at the claimed high temperature stability point to the maximum of its claimed movement range. METHOD 1) Six-inch long pieces of 2-inch (50mm) nominal material are removed from their shrink-wrap and hardboard packaging, and any mounting-adhesive release liners are removed. 2) The samples are installed between the faces of identical, aluminum, clamping jigs. 3) By tightening the bolts in the clamping jigs, the samples are compressed down to 1” (the -50% movement claim. This dimension would be achieved in actual applications during the heat of the summer as joints close due to the expansion of adjacent structural materials). 4) The samples are placed on a metal baking sheet, in a scientific oven, tilted at an angle of 30 degrees. 5) The samples are then baked at 185-deg.F (85-deg.C) for 3 hours. (This temperature chosen to simulate a south-facing, summer season, mid-day exposure on a dark-colored, metal substrate like a window mullion). 6) After 3 hours, the oven door is opened and the samples observed for signs of instability of the impregnation, bleeding, and/or any change in the material. If bleeding has occurred, the test is failed and discontiued. 7) The samples are allowed to cool to room temperature. 8) The clamping jig bolts are loosened to allow the samples to recover. The recovery of the material over the next 3-24 hours observed. OBSERVATIONS: As the temperature slowly drops to room temperature the substrates are moved slowly apart. The acrylic-impregnated SEISMIC COLORSEAL begins immediately to self-expand and the silicone bellows achieves expansion to 3-inches (75mm) within 3 hours while the acrylic impregnated foam backing expands to beyond 3-inches (75mm).
CONCLUSIONS While there remains a place in the market for low-movement, moderate-temperature applications for asphalt or wax-based products, many of today's construction environments and applications call for higher performance. Regardless, manufacturers should be held accountable to prove their product performance to the claims they make in data sheets. Consequently, should you be specifying an impregnated foam sealant product we suggest you require proof of movement capability and temperature stability in combination, and incorporate the following language in your specifications: All
products to be certified in writing to be free, according to independent
testing using
FTIR
and DSC, in composition
of any waxes or asphalts, wax compounds or asphalt compounds. All
substitute candidates shall be certified in writing to be:
Independent Lab Certification--Wax Free All of EMSEAL's foam sealants are certified by independent laboratory to be free of wax or wax compounds. Click Here to access the test reports. Demand the same of substitutes. Still Skeptical?
Open, handle, and even run these simples tests to compare for yourself. We are confident you will agree that it is possible to offer the best possible performance while delivering the best value, custom made for your job, at lead times that respect your project schedule: SEISMIC COLORSEAL, COLORSEAL, DSM SYSTEM, BACKERSEAL, SJS SYSTEM, HORIZONTAL COLORSEAL. Once again, your feedback as to the conditions of performance used to validate our claims, or challenges to facts presented are invited. Please send them to content@emseal.com. Thank you. For complete guide specifications for EMSEAL products, please go the individual product pages at our Product and Application Index. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Last Modified: May 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||